Legal Opinion

Roe v. Dailey

Texas Commission of Appeals

Decided May 17, 1880No. Case No. 3589Published

Appeal from Dallas. Tried below before the Hon. Z. Hunt. The opinion states the case.

1Opinion of the CourtWalkek, P. J.

The appellant instituted his suit against the appellees to enjoin the sale of three certain city lots contiguous to each other, under an execution in favor of appellee D. Dailey, against one Pleasant Taylor, issued and levied on said lots as the property of said Taylor, to satisfy a judgment in the district court of Dallas county in favor of said Dailey against said Taylor, rendered in July, A. D. 1874. The petition alleges that said lots were acquired by conveyances made in pursuance of purchases made by the appellant from Mrs. Haney P. Taylor, the wife of said Pleasant Taylor, of one of the…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Pixley v. HugginsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1860
  2. Eccles v. DanielsTexas Supreme Court · 1856
  3. Huston v. BerryTexas Supreme Court · 1848
  4. O'Brien v. HilburnTexas Supreme Court · 1858
  5. Carlin v. HudsonTexas Supreme Court · 1854

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API