Vencil v. Valmont Industries, Inc.
Nebraska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
473 N.W.2d 409 (1991)
239 Neb. 31
Daniel J. VENCIL, Appellant,
v.
VALMONT INDUSTRIES, INC., Appellee.
No. 90-1065.
Supreme Court of Nebraska.
August 30, 1991.
Richard L. Swenson, Omaha, for appellant.
Eric W. Kruger and William L. Switzer, Jr., of Rickerson, Welch & Kruger, Omaha, for appellee.
HASTINGS, C.J., and BOSLAUGH, WHITE, CAPORALE, SHANAHAN, GRANT and FAHRNBRUCH, JJ.
2Per curiam
Plaintiff-appellant, Daniel J. Vencil, asserts, in summary, that the court below wrongly interpreted the applicable law and further erred in concluding that the evidence failed to establish he was entitled to workers' compensation…
Also in this document: Dissent · Shanahan; Dissent · Grant; Concurrence.
3Cases cited19 opinions
- Fruehauf Corp. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
- State Ex Rel. Spire v. ConwayNebraska Supreme Court · 1991
- Sandel v. Packaging Co. of AmericaNebraska Supreme Court · 1982
- Osteen v. A. C. & S., Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1981
- Hayes v. A.M. Cohron, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1987
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.