Legal Opinion

Schmelzer v. Norfleet

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided November 13, 1995No. 94 Civ. 8287 (DC)PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM DECISION

CHIN, District Judge.

Pro se plaintiff Edward Schmelzer brings this action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 seeking monetary damages for alleged violations of his Fourteenth Amendment Due Process rights. Defendant Barry Norfleet moves pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) to dismiss the action. For the reasons that follow, the motion is granted.

BACKGROUND 1

At the time of the alleged constitutional deprivation, Schmelzer was incarcerated at Sing Sing Correctional Facility in Ossining, New York. On April 11, 1994, for reasons that are not set forth in the complaint, Nor-fleet confined Schmelzer to…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  3. Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  4. Sandin v. ConnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  5. McKinnon v. PattersonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1977

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Cespedes v. CoughlinDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1997
  2. Quartararo v. CattersonDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1996
  3. Roucchio v. CoughlinDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1996
  4. Brooks v. ChappiusDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2006
  5. Rodriguez v. McGinnisDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1998

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API