Legal Opinion

Brewster v. City of Peru

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided June 17, 1899PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Appeal from the County Court of LaSalle county; the Hon. H. W. Johnson, Judge, presiding. This is a proceeding by special taxation for the improvement by curbing and macadamizing of Marion street, and certain parts óf Putnam, Second and Peoria streets in the city of Peru in LaSalle county.

Read the full summary

Appeal from the County Court of LaSalle county; the Hon. H. W. Johnson, Judge, presiding. This is a proceeding by special taxation for the improvement by curbing and macadamizing of Marion street, and certain parts óf Putnam, Second and Peoria streets in the city of Peru in LaSalle county. The improvement was to be of the whole of Marion street, and of Putnam street from its southern line to Second street, and of Second street from West street to Peoria street, and of “Peoria street from the north line of the intersection of Second and Peoria streets to the northern limits of the city of…

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Magruder

Many objections were filed to the confirmation of the assessment; but we deem it necessary to notice only one of them. The first objection, made by appellants in the court below, was that the nature, character, description and extent of the alleged improvements, for which the assessment was extended or levied, were not specified in the ordinance. The ordinance was passed on June 29, 1897. Section 1 of the ordinance provides that “the curb shall be constructed on the ground in alternate sections, and the top edge shall conform to the line and grade of said streets, as established by an…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Chicago & Northern Pacific Railroad v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1898
  2. City of Alton v. Middleton's HeirsIllinois Supreme Court · 1895
  3. City of Carlinville v. McClureIllinois Supreme Court · 1895
  4. Lake Shore & Michigan Southern Railroad v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1870
  5. Cramer v. City of CharlestonIllinois Supreme Court · 1898

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Chase v. TroutCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
  2. Charles v. Big Sandy & Cumberland RailroadSupreme Court of Virginia · 1925
  3. Craig v. People ex rel. GannawayIllinois Supreme Court · 1901
  4. City of Richmond v. ChildreySupreme Court of Virginia · 1920
  5. In re Special Assessment by Creve CoeurAppellate Court of Illinois · 1977

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API