Legal Opinion

Hoxsie v. Nodine

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided May 29, 1903No. 859PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtMorrow, Circuit Judge

The defendants, in offering the papers in the case of "Hoxsie v. Nodine in the so-called “municipal court” at Anvil City, did not offer them as the evidence of an adjudication in a de facto court, nor as the evidence of proceedings in arbitration and award, and the objection to the *161ruling of the court in admitting the papers in evidence for the sole purpose of reducing damages or rebutting the evidence or inference of malice, gross negligence, or oppression on the part of the defendants, does not distinctly and specifically present the question whether the papers were admissible for the other…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Dahms v. SearsOregon Supreme Court · 1885
  2. Minnich v. Lancaster & Lititz Electric Railway Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1902
  3. Cooper v. BlairOregon Supreme Court · 1886
  4. Gloss v. BlackSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1879

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Barry v. LeglerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1930

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API