Phinney v. Vinson
Supreme Court of Vermont
1Opinion of the Court
Plaintiffs appeal from a summary judgment entered against them in a medical malpractice action. They argue that an admission by defendant doctor was sufficient to avoid summary judgment on liability. Defendant performed a transurethral resection of the prostate upon plaintiff Robert Phinney, but recurring pain caused the need for another operation by a different doctor. Following this operation, defendant allegedly said that the second doctor told him that he had performed an “inadequate resection” and he apologized to plaintiff “for his failure to do so.” Plaintiffs argue that this…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Woronka v. SewallMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1946
- Begin v. RichmondSupreme Court of Vermont · 1988
- Wooten v. CurryCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1961
- Utzler v. Medical Center Hosp. of VermontSupreme Court of Vermont · 1987
3Cited by3 opinions
- Woods v. ZeluffCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2007
- Short v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Vermont · 1995
- Wilson v. University of Chicago Medical CenterAppellate Court of Illinois · 2023