Legal Opinion

State v. . Miller

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided May 19, 1943PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBarnhill, J.

In its charge the court instructed the jury as to Pete Miller as follows:

“There is another principle applicable, as I understand the evidence in this case, and that is this: If the defendant, Pete Miller, provoked the fight or the killing by using any language or conduct toward the deceased, 0. D. Grimsley, or the son of the deceased, ~W. G. Grimsley, which was calculated and intended to bring about the fight, then, gentlemen of the jury, the plea of self-defense would not be available to him, unless he shows that he had abandoned the fight, and that the deceased had notice of such…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. State v. . AndersonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. FrizzelleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
  2. Hunt v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1957
  3. State v. TannCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1982
  4. Mosley v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1971
  5. State v. TemplesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API