Legal Opinion
State v. . Miller
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Decided May 19, 1943PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBarnhill, J.
In its charge the court instructed the jury as to Pete Miller as follows:
“There is another principle applicable, as I understand the evidence in this case, and that is this: If the defendant, Pete Miller, provoked the fight or the killing by using any language or conduct toward the deceased, 0. D. Grimsley, or the son of the deceased, ~W. G. Grimsley, which was calculated and intended to bring about the fight, then, gentlemen of the jury, the plea of self-defense would not be available to him, unless he shows that he had abandoned the fight, and that the deceased had notice of such…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- State v. . AndersonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
3Cited by7 opinions
- State v. FrizzelleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
- Hunt v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1957
- State v. TannCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1982
- Mosley v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1971
- State v. TemplesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.