State v. Earl
Montana Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Regnier
¶1 The Appellant, James Earl, appeals from the judgment entered by the Twenty-Second Judicial District Court, Stillwater County, following his conviction on two counts of sexual assault. We affirm.
¶2 We address the following issues on appeal:
¶3 1. Did the District Court abuse its discretion when it denied Earl’s motion to continue filed three days prior to the jury trial?
¶4 2. Did the District Court properly instruct the jury?
¶5 3. Did the State present sufficient evidence for the jury to convict Earl of sexual assault against T.W. and A.W.?
¶6 4. Are Earl’s claims of ineffective assistance of…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- State v. FinleyMontana Supreme Court · 1996
- State v. GallagherMontana Supreme Court · 2001
- State v. WhiteMontana Supreme Court · 2001
- Hagen v. StateMontana Supreme Court · 1999
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- State v. DanielsMontana Supreme Court · 2003
- State v. GuillMontana Supreme Court · 2010
- State v. GrixtiMontana Supreme Court · 2005
- State v. NovakMontana Supreme Court · 2005
- State v. MeredithMontana Supreme Court · 2010
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.