Legal Opinion

W. T. Grant Co. v. Casady

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided January 5, 1948No. 15,775PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Alter

Luona Casady, plaintiff below, recovered a judgment against W. T. Grant Company, a corporation, defendant, to review which this writ of error.

The action was originally instituted against the Grant Company, and the City and County of Denver, a municipal corporation. Upon trial to a jury the city was exonerated and is not a party here.

It is alleged in the complaint that plaintiff, without negligence or carelessness on her part, sustained injuries resulting from a fall on the sidewalk at the intersection of Sixteenth and Stout streets in the city of Denver, which sidewalk was adjacent to the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Dunbar v. OlivieriSupreme Court of Colorado · 1935
  2. Kelly v. RoseNew York Court of Appeals · 1943
  3. Newton Oil Co. v. BockholdSupreme Court of Colorado · 1946
  4. Hendley v. Daw Drug Company, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1944
  5. Grooms v. Union Guardian Trust Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1944

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Lyons v. NasbySupreme Court of Colorado · 1989
  2. Board of County Commissioners v. MorelandSupreme Court of Colorado · 1988
  3. Silverstein v. Sisters of Charity of LeavenworthColorado Court of Appeals · 1976
  4. Bittle v. BrunettiSupreme Court of Colorado · 1988
  5. Lininger v. KnightSupreme Court of Colorado · 1951

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API