Legal Opinion
Bracey v. Bracey
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided April 16, 1991No. 88-732PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
STEADMAN, Associate Judge:
On April 28, 1988, the trial court entered “Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law and Judgment of Absolute Divorce,” into which a Separation and Property Settlement Agreement (Agreement) entered into by the parties was incorporated by reference but not merged. The parties had separated in early 1979. Their son, then almost two years old, had subsequently spent two years (1981-83) in the custody of his father and the remaining time with his mother. At the divorce proceedings, several issues were raised and explored at length, includ*416ing visitation rights and a requested…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Lanahan v. NeviusDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1974
- Waverly Taylor, Inc. v. PolingerDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1990
- Spencer v. SpencerDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1985
- Portlock v. PortlockDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1986
3Cited by5 opinions
- Duffy v. DuffyDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2005
- Steuart Investment Co. v. Meyer Group, Ltd.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2013
- Curtis v. GordonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2009
- Nevarez v. NevarezDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1993
- Bracey v. BraceyDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1991