Larson v. Commissioner of Revenue
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
TOMLJANOVICH, Justice.
Relator Robert Scott Larson appeals from the determinations of the Commissioner of Revenue and the Minnesota Tax Court that he is personally Hable for the sales and withholding tax deficiencies of D & B Cleaners, Inc. for various periods in 1990, 1991, and 1992. The tax court held that Larson was an “employer” with “legal control” over D & B’s payment of wages, within the meaning of Minn.Stat. § 290.92, subd. 1(4) (1996), and a “person” with “control, supervision or re-sponsibiHty” for D & B’s payment of sales tax, as defined in Minn.Stat. § 297A.01, subd. 2…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Anderson v. Commissioner of HighwaysSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1964
- Transport Leasing Corporation v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1972
- F-D Oil Co. v. Commissioner of RevenueSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1997
- Montgomery Ward & Co., Inc. v. County of HennepinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1992
- Midwest Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. CommissionerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Stevens v. CommissionerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2012
- Byers v. Commissioner of RevenueSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2007
- Lo v. Commissioner of RevenueSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2017
- Hartung v. State, Department of LaborAlaska Supreme Court · 2001
- Hartung v. State, Department of LaborAlaska Supreme Court · 2001