Legal Opinion

Lo v. Commissioner of Revenue

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided April 12, 2017No. A16-0918PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Considered and decided by the court without oral argument.

OPINION

MCKEIG, Justice.

This appeal from the tax court requires us to determine whether a corporate officer who funds and controls a corporation is personally liable for unpaid sales taxes when the corporation is managed by someone else. The tax court held that respondent Yik Lo was not personally liable for the unpaid sales taxes, reasoning that he did not have sufficient functional control over the corporation’s operations notwithstanding his formal authority over the business. We reverse.

FACTS

Yik Lo emigrated from China to the United…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Morton Buildings, Inc. v. Commissioner of RevenueSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1992
  2. F-D Oil Co. v. Commissioner of RevenueSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1997
  3. Benoit v. Commissioner of RevenueSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
  4. Carlson v. Commissioner of RevenueSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1994
  5. Krech v. Commissioner of RevenueSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1997

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Kroll Ontrack, LLC v. Comm'r RevenueSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API