Legal Opinion

Martinez-Ferrer v. Richardson-Merrell, Inc.

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 30, 1980No. Civ. 55884PublishedCited by 41 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

KAUS, P. J.

This is an appeal from a judgment for defendants after their motion for summary judgment against plaintiff Raul Martinez-Ferrer (Raul) was granted. Defendants cross appeal from the granting of plaintiff Nancy Martinez’ (Nancy) motion for new trial.

Plaintiffs’ first amended complaint alleged causes of action 1 arising from personal injuries—cataracts—resulting from Raul’s ingestion of the drug MER/29 which was manufactured and distributed by defendant Richardson-Merrell and provided to Raul by Richardson-Merrell’s salesman, defendant Leo Spengler. In the complaint, Nancy,…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Sindell v. Abbott LaboratoriesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Nestle v. City of Santa MonicaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
  3. Davies v. KrasnaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
  4. G. D. Searle & Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
  5. Spaulding v. CameronCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by41 opinions

  1. Jolly v. Eli Lilly & Co.California Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Pierce v. Johns-Manville Sales Corp.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1983
  3. In Re Johns-Manville Corp.United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 1984
  4. Eagle-Picher Industries, Inc. v. CoxDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1985
  5. Grisham v. Philip Morris U.S.A., Inc.California Supreme Court · 2007

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API