Martinez-Ferrer v. Richardson-Merrell, Inc.
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
KAUS, P. J.
This is an appeal from a judgment for defendants after their motion for summary judgment against plaintiff Raul Martinez-Ferrer (Raul) was granted. Defendants cross appeal from the granting of plaintiff Nancy Martinez’ (Nancy) motion for new trial.
Plaintiffs’ first amended complaint alleged causes of action 1 arising from personal injuries—cataracts—resulting from Raul’s ingestion of the drug MER/29 which was manufactured and distributed by defendant Richardson-Merrell and provided to Raul by Richardson-Merrell’s salesman, defendant Leo Spengler. In the complaint, Nancy,…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Sindell v. Abbott LaboratoriesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980
- Nestle v. City of Santa MonicaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
- Davies v. KrasnaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
- G. D. Searle & Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
- Spaulding v. CameronCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by41 opinions
- Jolly v. Eli Lilly & Co.California Supreme Court · 1988
- Pierce v. Johns-Manville Sales Corp.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1983
- In Re Johns-Manville Corp.United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 1984
- Eagle-Picher Industries, Inc. v. CoxDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1985
- Grisham v. Philip Morris U.S.A., Inc.California Supreme Court · 2007
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.