Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Maynard v. Hammond

West Virginia Supreme Court

Decided December 21, 1953No. 10638Published

1ConcurrenceLovins, Judge

I concur in the result in this case, but I do not agree with the conclusions shown by point four of the syllabus and the corollary of that conclusion' as expressed in point five. The phrase “law of the case” has received *254frequent and extended treatment. Note' Black’s Law Dictionary, Fourth Edition, page 1030.

It seems that the Court rests its conclusion as to the “law of the case” in the following expressions relative to ballots 8, 9, 10 and 11, precinct number 3, in the City of Williamson, found in the opinion of this Court, written by Judge Riley, in the case of State v. Hatfield, 71 S. E.…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Bumgardner v. MillsWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1949
  2. Morris v. Board of CanvassersWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1901
  3. Hatfield v. Board of Canvassers of Mingo Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1925
  4. Campbell v. LynchWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1921
  5. Brown v. CarrWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1947

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API