Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Bumgardner v. Mills

West Virginia Supreme Court

Decided March 22, 1949No. 10148PublishedCited by 57 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Haymond, President :

On February 14, 1949, the petitioner, Keith 0. Bum-gardner, instituted in this Court this original proceeding in mandamus. The petition prayed that a writ issue to require the defendants, Frank Mills, E. George Smith, and Brent G. Rittenhouse, Commissioners of the County Court of Harrison County, and as such the board of canvassers of that county, to reconvene, set aside its order of December 30, 1948, entered upon a recount, by which the defendant, Fitzhugh Reynolds, was declared to be the duly elected Sheriff of Harrison County, and to enter an order declaring the…

2Cases cited62 opinions

  1. Daniel v. SimmsWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1901
  2. Bridges v. ShallcrossWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1873
  3. Booten v. PinsonWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1915
  4. Brazie v. Fayette County CommissionersWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1884
  5. State ex rel. Matheny v. County Court of Wyoming CountyWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1900

57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by57 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Cohen v. ManchinWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Manchin v. DunfeeWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1984
  3. White v. ManchinWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1984
  4. State ex rel. Zickefoose v. WestWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1960
  5. State ex rel. Staley v. County Court of Wayne CountyWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1952

52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API