Legal Opinion

Motion Control Systems, Inc. v. East

Supreme Court of Virginia

Decided June 8, 2001No. Record 001940PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Lacy

Motion Control Systems, Inc. (MCS) appeals a decision of the trial court holding that a covenant not to compete executed by its former employee, Gregory C. East, was overbroad and therefore unenforceable. East assigns as cross-error the trial court’s entry of an injunction under the Uniform Trade Secrets Act, Code §§ 59.1-336 through -343, permanently enjoining him from “disclosing to anyone any confidential, proprietary or trade secret information of Motion Control.” We will affirm the trial court’s determination that the covenant not to compete was overbroad and unenforceable, but because…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Richardson v. Paxton CompanySupreme Court of Virginia · 1962
  2. Roanoke Engineering Sales Co. v. RosenbaumSupreme Court of Virginia · 1982
  3. Blue Ridge Anesthesia & Critical Care, Inc. v. GidickSupreme Court of Virginia · 1990
  4. Musselman v. Glass Works, L.L.C.Supreme Court of Virginia · 2000

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Omniplex World Services v. U.S. Inv.Supreme Court of Virginia · 2005
  2. HOME PARAMOUNT PEST CONTROL v. ShafferSupreme Court of Virginia · 2011
  3. Darton Envtl., Inc. v. Fjuvo Collections, LLCDistrict Court, W.D. Virginia · 2018
  4. Lasership, Inc. v. WatsonFairfax County Circuit Court · 2009
  5. Parikh v. Family Care Center, Inc.Supreme Court of Virginia · 2007

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API