Legal Opinion

Grills v. Branigin

District Court, S.D. Indiana

Decided May 20, 1968No. IP 64-C-101PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION ON REMAND

2Per curiam

The previous history of the above entitled action in this Court is set out in the opinion of the Court filed February 17, 1966, reported as Grills v. Brani*178gin, D. C., 255 F.Supp. 155. Such previous opinion held, Judge Holder dissenting, that Chapter 205 of the Acts of 1965, enacted by the General Assembly of Indiana and reapportioning Indiana’s eleven congressional districts, was constitutional within the provisions of Article 1, § 2 of the Constitution of the United States.

The intervening plaintiffs, Dorothy C. Duddleston, et al., thereafter appealed such decision to the…

3Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Reynolds v. SimsSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  2. Wesberry v. SandersSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  3. Hayburn's CaseSupreme Court of the United States · 1792
  4. Colegrove v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  5. Smiley v. HolmSupreme Court of the United States · 1932

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by11 opinions

  1. In Re Initiative Petition No. 317, Etc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1982
  2. Chavis v. WhitcombDistrict Court, S.D. Indiana · 1970
  3. Skolnick v. Board Of Commissioners Of Cook CountyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1970
  4. Brady v. New Jersey Redistricting CommissionSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1992
  5. Skolnick v. Board of CommissionersCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1970

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API