Legal Opinion

State v. Crane

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided October 9, 1991No. 87-10-36098, C87-11-36752 CA A63950 (Control), CA A63951PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Per curiam

In this consolidated appeal, defendant challenges the sentences entered after she pled guilty to charges of fraudulent use of a credit card, ORS 165.055, theft in the second degree, ORS 164.045, and two counts of forgery in the first degree. ORS 165.013. Our review of the trial court’s action is limited to determining whether the sentences exceed the maximum allowable by law or are cruel and unusual. ORS 138.050(l)(a).

The state concedes that the trial court exceeded its authority when it imposed a five-year term of imprisonment with a 30-month minimum on the charge of fraudulent use of a…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. State v. RacicotCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. O'NEALLCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
  2. State v. VermaasCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
  3. State v. DetermannCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
  4. State v. SuggsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993
  5. State v. HicksCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API