Legal Opinion

Pelton v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided March 3, 1909No. 22PublishedCited by 15 opinions

The opinion states the case.

1Opinion of the Court

RAMSEY, Judge.

Appellant was charged with forgery. The indictment charges forgery of the following instrument:

“Form 648 Standard. (10)
“Santa Fe.
“Ballinger, 6/27, 1907.
“Received of B. D. Pelton, agent......................the sum of Thirty-seven & 50/100 Dollars..............being full payment for loading handling mdse.
“37.50. Geo. J. Jones.”

The substance of the contention in the motion to quash is that the indictment charges no offense against the law, and inferentially the instrument is not such as to constitute the basis of forgery. Several special exceptions are urged to the validity of the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Taylor v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1906

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Harrell v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1994
  2. Wrather v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1943
  3. State v. HughesArizona Supreme Court · 1967
  4. Ernster v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1957
  5. Kaufman v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1913

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API