Legal Opinion

Taylor v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided October 31, 1906No. 3495PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DAVIDSON, Presiding Judge.

This is the second appeal from-a conviction of passing a forged instrument. There are a great many very interesting questions suggested for revision, but from a review of the record, these may be condensed into a few leading propositions.

During the trial the State was permitted to introduce subpoenas issued to different counties for witnesses. Various objections are urged to the introduction of this -testimony. The theory of the State was that 'appellant, either forged, or passed as true the instrument alleged in the indictment, when he had knowledge of its forgery.…

2Cited by9 opinions

  1. Ernster v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1957
  2. Pelton v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1909
  3. Patton v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1926
  4. Cox v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1958
  5. Cox v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1958

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API