Taylor v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
DAVIDSON, Presiding Judge.
This is the second appeal from-a conviction of passing a forged instrument. There are a great many very interesting questions suggested for revision, but from a review of the record, these may be condensed into a few leading propositions.
During the trial the State was permitted to introduce subpoenas issued to different counties for witnesses. Various objections are urged to the introduction of this -testimony. The theory of the State was that 'appellant, either forged, or passed as true the instrument alleged in the indictment, when he had knowledge of its forgery.…
2Cited by9 opinions
- Ernster v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1957
- Pelton v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1909
- Patton v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1926
- Cox v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1958
- Cox v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1958
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.