Legal Opinion

Knotts v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided November 16, 2000No. 01-99-00225-CRPublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

2Per curiam

Appellant appeals his conviction for possession of cocaine.

Appellant’s retained counsel has filed a brief meeting the requirements of Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), in which, after reviewing the record, he concludes that the appeal is frivolous and without merit. See Gainous v. State, 436 S.W.2d 137, 138 (Tex.Crim.App.1969).

Only appointed counsel are required to file an Anders brief. Retained counsel are not required to do so. See Nguyen v. State, 11 S.W.3d 376, 378 (Tex.App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 2000, no pet.). A retained attorney, upon…

3Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Anders v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Gainous v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1969
  3. Nguyen v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2000

4Cited by13 opinions

  1. Ahmed Jabbori v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2015
  2. Arquimides Gonzales Velasquez v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2004
  3. Belinda Dawn Tidwell v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2012
  4. Chikevia Rena Roberts v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2013
  5. Chikevia Rena Roberts v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2013

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API