Legal Opinion

Polm v. Hession

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 3, 1950No. Appeal, 186PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Me. Justice Hoeace Steen,

We are concerned here with a type of accident with which the courts have very frequently been called upon to deal, — a person falling in a place insufficiently lighted.

Plaintiff, together with an escort, visited defendant’s tavern at the northwest corner of Chancellor Street and Bellevue Court, Philadelphia, on a Saturday evening at about 10:30 o’clock. There are three entrances to the tavern, two on the Bellevue Court side and one on Chancellor Street; plaintiff, who had never previously been on the premises, entered from Bellevue Court. While in the…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Dively v. Penn-Pittsburgh Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
  2. Vetter v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1935
  3. Murphy v. Bernheim & Sons, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
  4. Bailey v. Alexander Realty Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1941
  5. Cathcart v. Sears, Roebuck and Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1935

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Just v. Sons of Italy HallSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  2. Scurco v. KartSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1954
  3. Ellis v. DrabSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1953
  4. Denver v. SharplessSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1960
  5. Hall v. GlickSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1955

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API