Legal Opinion · Dissent

Charnes v. Norwest Leasing, Inc.

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided March 12, 1990No. 88SC524Published

1DissentErickson, Justice

I respectfully dissent. In my view, both the district court and the court of appeals correctly held that Norwest substantially complied with the requirements of section 39-26-117(1)(b), 16B C.R.S. (1982) and that Norwest’s property is exempt from the tax lien imposed by section 39-26-117(1)(a). Norwest Leasing, Inc. v. Charnes, 767 P.2d 775 (Colo.App.1988). The district court, in granting summary judgment for Norwest, concluded that the filing of a financing statement, a legal description of the property and a schedule of the leased property substantially complied with and was sufficient to…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. ZAMEL, ET UX. v. Port of NY AuthoritySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1970
  2. Superior/Ideal v. OSKALOOSA BD. OF REV.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1988
  3. Trussell v. FishSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1941
  4. Jones v. ShortAlaska Supreme Court · 1985
  5. Estate of RuddMontana Supreme Court · 1962

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API