Larson v. Astrue
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
WOOD, Circuit Judge.
Lynn Marie Larson contends that she is disabled by anxiety, depression, and ankle pain. She applied for Supplemental Security Income (“SSI”), but an Administrative Law Judge (“ALJ”) concluded that her impairments, although severe, are not disabling. The district court upheld the agency’s decision, Larson v. Astrue, No. 09-cv-067-bbc, 2009 WL 3379144, at *1 (W.D.Wis. Oct.19, 2009), and Larson appeals. Among other things, she argues that the ALJ erred by discrediting her testimony and not giving controlling weight to the opinion of her long-term treating psychiatrist. We agree…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. Chenery Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Donna J. Clifford v. Kenneth S. Apfel, Commissioner of Social SecurityCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2000
- Anne J. Holohan v. Larry G. Massanari, Acting Commissionerof SsaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- Elder v. AstrueCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2008
- Rabbers v. Commissioner Social Security AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2009
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by340 opinions
- Bettie Burmester v. Nancy BerryhillCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2019
- Esin Arakas v. Commissioner, Social SecurityCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2020
- Jelinek v. AstrueCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2011
- Scott v. AstrueCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2011
- Kip Yurt v. Carolyn ColvinCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2014
335 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.