Begay v. Foutz & Tanner, Inc.
New Mexico Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
WALTERS, Judge.
Plaintiffs Begay and Reeves are Indians who frequently pawned Indian jewelry articles with defendant trading company. Both complained, in separate suits below, that when they defaulted in payment of the loans collateralized by their pawned jewelry, defendant attempted to retain the collateral pursuant to § 505 of the Uniform Commercial Code (§ 55-9-505, N.M.S.A. 1978), instead of proceeding properly under § 504 which requires notice of intention to sell and delivery of any surplus to the debt- or. The jewelry was sold ultimately by defendants as “dead pawn” to a related…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Standard Oil Company of New Jersey, Appts. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
- Ora Lee Williams v. Walker-Thomas Furniture Company, William Thorne v. Walker-Thomas Furniture CompanyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1965
- Hall v. Owen County State BankIndiana Court of Appeals · 1977
- National Equipment Rental, Ltd. v. Priority Electronics Corp.District Court, E.D. New York · 1977
- Kruse, Kruse & Miklosko, Inc. v. BeedyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1976
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Wing Pawn Shop v. Taxation & Revenue DepartmentNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1991
- Vogel v. Carolina International, Inc.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1985
- Leeling v. Smith (In Re Leeling)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Colorado · 1991
- First National Bank v. RuttleNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1989
- Begay v. Foutz & Tanner, Inc.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1979
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.