Legal Opinion · Dissent

Conway v. Cumming

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided July 9, 1993No. 92-286Published

1DissentDooley, J.

Plaintiff, now represented by counsel, has moved for reargument raising as a ground, among others, *128that plaintiff should have been assigned counsel below. The Court has rejected this ground on the ground it was not preserved.

As defendants emphasize, plaintiff appearing pro se never raised the right to counsel point although he proceeded in forma pauperis both here and in the trial court. Following the date of submission of this case without argument, this Court decided in a factually similar case that an inmate was entitled to appointed counsel under the Public Defender Act. See Fletcher v.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Donald A. Lowry v. Bankers Life and Casualty Retirement PlanCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1989
  2. Wolfe v. YudichakSupreme Court of Vermont · 1990
  3. In Re MorseSupreme Court of Vermont · 1980
  4. Fletcher v. GorczykSupreme Court of Vermont · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API