Legal Opinion · Dissent

United States v. Kaiser

Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces

Decided March 14, 2003No. 02-0609/AR; Crim.App. ARMY 9900485Published

1DissentCrawford, Chief Judge

Rule for Courts-Martial 913(a) [hereinafter R.C.M.] provides the following guidance regarding preliminary instructions: “The military judge may give such preliminary instructions as may be appropriate. If mixed pleas have been entered, the military judge should ordinarily defer informing the members of the offenses to which the accused pleaded guilty until after the findings on the remaining contested offenses have been entered.” The nonbinding Discussion following the Rule adds:

Exceptions to the rule requiring the military judge to defer informing the members of an accused’s prior pleas of…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. United States v. OlanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  3. United States v. FradySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  4. Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  5. United States v. YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1985

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API