Legal Opinion

St. Louis Cotton Compress Co. v. American Cotton Co.

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided September 7, 1903No. 1,913PublishedCited by 8 opinions

In Error to the Circuit Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Missouri.

1Opinion of the Court

SANBORN, Circuit judge.

This writ of error challenges a judgment of the Circuit Court which quashed the return of the service of a summons upon the defendant, the American Cotton Company, and dismissed the action against it on the ground that the Circuit Court had acquired no jurisdiction of the defendant. The plaintiff, the St. Louis Cotton Compress Company, a corporation of the state of Missouri, filed a petition in the circuit court of the city of St. Louis in the state of Missouri to recover $32,379.60 from the defendant below, the American Cotton Company, a corporation of the state of New…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Conley v. Mathieson Alkali WorksSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
  2. Vance v. VanceSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
  3. M'iver, Lessees v. RaganSupreme Court of the United States · 1817
  4. Geer v. Mathieson Alkali WorksSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
  5. United States v. JahnSupreme Court of the United States · 1894

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Taylor v. EastonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1910
  2. Morrisdale Coal Co. v. Pennsylvania R. Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1910
  3. Baker v. Town of ManitouCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1921
  4. American Electric Welding Co. v. Lalance & Grosjean Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1918
  5. Davis v. Cleveland, C., C. & St. L. Ry. Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1907

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API