Legal Opinion

State v. Clardy

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided February 27, 1906PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Before Krugh, J., Laurens, July, 1905. Indictment against Coogler Clardy and Dick Davis for murder of Chris Herron. From sentence on verdict of manslaughter, defendants appeal. cite: Criminal intent must be proved: 2 Lea., 619; 11 Rich. E:q., 489; 62 S. C., 2-70; 1 B-ish. Crim. L., sec. 73-5; Clark Grim. L., .42, 43; 3 Green, on Ev., sec. 14, note 1. Accidental killing is no-t an affirmative defense: 68 S. C., 304; 24 S. E., 996.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Justice Jones.

The defendants, indicted for the murder of Chris Herron, were convicted oif manslaughter and sentenced each to seven years in the penitentiary.

On the 19th day of March, 1905, at Bethel Grove Church, in Laurens County, Chris Herron received a pistol shot wound from a pistol fired while in the hands of Coogler Clardy, from which he died about two'weeks later. Coogler Clardy claimed that the shooting was done accidentally while he and the deceased were engaged in a friendly struggle over the possession of the pistol, while H'erron was.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. McDanielSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1904
  2. State v. . VinesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1885
  3. State v. EmerySupreme Court of Missouri · 1883
  4. Austin v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1900
  5. State v. MorganSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1894

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State v. LawsonWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1945
  2. State v. BarnettSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1951
  3. State v. EvansWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1983
  4. Capra v. BallarbySupreme Court of Colorado · 1965
  5. State v. DixonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1936

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API