Legal Opinion
State v. Madrid
New Mexico Court of Appeals
Decided January 3, 1978No. 3220PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
WOOD, Chief Judge.
Defendant is charged with two marijuana offenses. The trial court granted defendant’s motion to suppress the marijuana; the State appealed. The appeal involves the validity of the wife’s consent to the search during which the marijuana was found by police officers.
Defendant suggests we should not consider the consent issue. He points out that the order suppressing the evidence does not set forth a basis for the trial court’s decision. He states that “it can be easily argued that the trial court suppressed the marijuana because the officers exceeded the scope of the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- United States v. MatlockSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Stoner v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Chapman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Stein v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1948
- United States v. Raymond Craig Wilson, United States of America v. Wilbert PolkCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1971
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- State v. CopelandNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1986
- State v. ClineNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1998
- State v. WrightNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1995
- State v. HenselNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1987
- Sullivan v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1986
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.