Legal Opinion
State v. Hensel
New Mexico Court of Appeals
Decided April 14, 1987No. 9088, 9189PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
GARCIA, Judge.
We granted defendants’ motion for rehearing to reconsider the issue of whether more than mere ownership is required for a third party to validly consent to a warrant-less search. As a result of the rehearing, we withdraw our opinion filed January 8, 1987 and substitute the following.
Defendants, Craig Hensel (Craig) and Ross Hensel (Ross), appeal the trial court’s order denying their motions to suppress physical evidence obtained as a result of an allegedly illegal search and seizure. Both pled guilty to manufacturing a controlled substance following the trial court’s…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Rakas v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- United States v. MatlockSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Stoner v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Chapman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- State v. DonaldsonNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1983
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- State v. HodgeNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1994
- State v. RiveraNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2008
- State v. WrightNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1995
- State v. CroccoNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2014
- State v. MunozNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1990
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.