Legal Opinion

Merchia v. Aref

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided September 29, 2025No. Civil Action No. 2024-2701Published

1Opinion of the Court

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA PANKAJ MERCHIA, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. 24-2701 (RC) ) SHEILA HASTINGS AREF, ) ) Defendant. ) MEMORANDUM OPINION I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiff Pankaj Merchia, appearing pro se, sues a resident of Virginia for defamation and related claims. Pending is Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction, lack of personal jurisdiction, and insufficient service of process. Although Plaintiff requested and was granted two extensions of time over Defendant’s objections, he has not responded to Defendant’s…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. Daimler AG v. BaumanSupreme Court of the United States · 2014
  3. Ruhrgas Ag v. Marathon Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1999
  4. Bristol-Myers Squibb Co. v. Superior Court of Cal., San Francisco Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 2017
  5. Ford Motor Co. v. Montana Eighth Judicial Dist.Supreme Court of the United States · 2021

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API