Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

In Re Tindell

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided November 1, 1955No. 36694Published

1Opinion of the Court

292 P.2d 1022 (1955)

In the Matter of Albert TINDELL and Sue Tindell, Dependent Minor Children.

No. 36694.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma.

November 1, 1955.

Rehearing Denied January 31, 1956.

Mac Q. Williamson, Atty. Gen., Owen J. Watts, Asst. Atty. Gen., Sandy Singleton, Attorney for Department of Public Welfare, Oklahoma City, for plaintiff in error.

A.H. Huggins, Norman, Bob Perdue, Wilburton, for defendant in error.

Gus Rinehart, Gomer Smith, Jr., Tom S. Williams, Claude Love, Oklahoma City, John Wallace, Miami, Okl., James B. Miller, Shawnee, amici curiae.

HALLEY, Justice.

Mandy Tindell, mother of the…

Also in this document: Concurrence · Welch; Concurrence · Davison.

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Ex Parte LewisCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1947
  2. In Re Adoption of Howard Clay HughesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
  3. Ex Parte WaltersCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1950
  4. Ex Parte ParkerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1945
  5. In Re TindellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1955

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API