Legal Opinion

Warren v. Adams

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided October 31, 1939No. 28111PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtOsborn, J.

Plaintiffs in error, G. Ed Warren, receiver of the Exchange National Company, a corporation, Matie Center and M. Marguerite Day, creditors of said corporation, plaintiffs in the trial court, appeal from a judgment of the district court of Tulsa county sustaining the separate demurrer of defendants in error Kate Chestnut, Alice C. Quinlan, and Margaret G. Smith to plaintiffs’ amended petition and dismissing said petition with judgment for said defendants when plaintiffs elected to stand thereon.

This action was brought by the plaintiffs above named against the former directors of the dissolved…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Hornor v. HenningSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
  2. National Bank v. . DillinghamNew York Court of Appeals · 1895
  3. Woolverton v. TaylorIllinois Supreme Court · 1890
  4. Rogers v. BonnettSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1894
  5. Watkinson v. AdamsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1939

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Midvale Mining & Manufacturing Co. v. Dutron Corp.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1977
  2. Brown Oil Co. v. ShipleyCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API