Legal Opinion

McClaugherty v. Water Co.

West Virginia Supreme Court

Decided March 22, 1910PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Petition of N. H. MeClaugherty for writ of mandamus against the Bluefield Waterworks & Improvement Company.-

1Opinion of the Court

BRANNON, Judge:

The Bluefield Water Works & Improvement Company is a corporation supplying the' city of Bluefield with water. N. H. MeClaugherty is a resident of that city owning a. lot fronting on one of its streets. He had a contract with the water company to furnish his residence with water. lie filed a petition 'in this Court alleging that the water company had cut off the water from his premises, and asking a mandamus to compel the water company to restore' water to his premises. The company laid a main pipe for carriage of water along.that street.

A law question‘of importance is raised by…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Dickerman v. Northern Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1900
  2. Richmond v. Dubuque & Sioux City R. R.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1868
  3. Pence v. BryantWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1903
  4. Gleason v. Waukesha CountyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1899
  5. International Water Co. v. City of El PasoCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1908

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. n.sidney Nyhus v. Travel Management CorporationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1972
  2. Wallihan v. HughesSupreme Court of Virginia · 1954
  3. Nord v. Butte Water Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1934
  4. Birmingham W. W. Co. v. HernandezSupreme Court of Alabama · 1916
  5. Goodloe v. City of RichmondCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1933

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API