Legal Opinion

State v. Trasvina

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided December 20, 1976No. 4087-1PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJames, J.

Javier Francisco Trasvina and Michael John Martin were each found guilty at a bench trial of two counts of unlawful possession of a controlled substance. They appeal contending that their convictions resulted from the introduction at trial of evidence seized by police during an unlawful search of Martin’s dwelling. In addition, Trasvina claims that, even if the search was lawful, he should not have been convicted since the State failed to prove that he had any possessory interest in the premises or in the controlled substances found there. We affirm.

Two issues are raised by this…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Aguilar v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  2. United States v. VentrescaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  3. Steele v. United States No. 1Supreme Court of the United States · 1925
  4. United States v. KahnSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  5. United States v. SklaroffDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 1971

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. State v. PerroneWashington Supreme Court · 1992
  2. State v. FisherWashington Supreme Court · 1982
  3. State v. GrovesNebraska Supreme Court · 1991
  4. State v. ChapinCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1994
  5. State v. ManceCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1996

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API