Legal Opinion

State v. Mance

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided June 28, 1996No. 18236-0-IIPublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtArmstrong, J.

Lincoln Manee appeals his conviction of possession of a controlled substance, contending that the trial court erred in refusing to suppress evidence of cocaine recovered during his detention following a car stop. Manee also claims the State failed to show a proper chain of custody for the drug evidence. We hold that, given the stipulated facts before it, the trial court erred in denying Mance’s suppression motion. Because we reverse Mance’s conviction on this basis, we do not reach the chain of custody issue.

FACTS

At the suppression hearing, the parties stipulated to the following facts. On…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Henry v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
  3. Whiteley v. Warden, Wyoming State PenitentiarySupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  4. State v. McFarlandWashington Supreme Court · 1995
  5. Rios v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. State v. WintersteinWashington Supreme Court · 2009
  2. State v. WintersteinWashington Supreme Court · 2009
  3. State v. GaddyWashington Supreme Court · 2004
  4. State v. GaddyWashington Supreme Court · 2004
  5. State v. OrtegaWashington Supreme Court · 2013

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API