Legal Opinion

People v. Frank

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided January 29, 1985PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

— Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: On appeal from his conviction for burglary, second degree, and grand larceny, second degree, after a retrial, defendant contends that he was improperly denied the minutes of the first trial, to which he claims he was entitled under CPL 240.45 and People v Rosario (9 NY2d 286). The trial court properly determined that the transcript was not discoverable under CPL 240.45 and Rosario and that, because it was as available to defendant as to the prosecution, defendant had the responsibility to obtain it if he believed it necessary. Defendant, who is…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. People v. RosarioNew York Court of Appeals · 1961
  2. People v. BallottNew York Court of Appeals · 1967
  3. People v. MontgomeryNew York Court of Appeals · 1966
  4. People v. SandersNew York Court of Appeals · 1973

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. People v. ThompsonNew York Supreme Court · 1998
  2. People v. BradleyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
  3. People v. TchilingurianAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
  4. People v. McGuireAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API