Miller v. Hurst
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Concurring in part, dissenting in partCirillo, Judge
I respectfully dissent from the majority holding that an order refusing to remove a compulsory nonsuit is appealable prior to the entry of judgment on the docket.
It is clear that an appeal does not lie from an order entering a nonsuit, but rather, an appeal may only be taken subsequent to the denial of a motion to remove the nonsuit. The majority holds that the appeal is actually taken from the order refusing to remove the nonsuit. However, I would hold that an order refusing to remove a nonsuit is not appealable until a judgment is entered on the order.
The majority has stated that an order…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- PAPIEVES Et Ux. v. KellySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1970
- Gibson v. MillerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
- Thomas M. Durkin & Sons, Inc. v. Nether Providence Township School AuthoritySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
- Nord v. Devault Contracting Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
- Jurich v. United Parcel Service of New York, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.