Nord v. Devault Contracting Co.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
ROBERTS, Justice.
This is an action in equity to enjoin construction of a private road. The trial court concluded that no right of appellants 1 would be invaded by construction of the road and denied relief. This appeal ensued. 2 The only issue properly presented is whether the chancellor erred in concluding that appellants possessed no easement in the land over which the road will be built. 3 We conclude that there was no error and therefore affirm.
Most of the facts were stipulated and, as supplemented by the unchallenged findings of the chancellor, they are as follows. 4
Th…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- SOLTIS Et Ux. v. MillerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
- McAndrews v. SPENCER Et Ux.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1972
3Cited by17 opinions
- Costigan v. Philadelphia Finance Department Employees Local 696Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
- Dudash v. DudashSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
- Barner v. BarnerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
- Potis v. CoonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
- Martin v. Sun Pipe Line Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.