Legal Opinion

In re Molina

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided March 29, 2019No. 05-19-00147-CVPublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by Justice Whitehill

This mandamus proceeding arises from a personal injury lawsuit. Plaintiff and real party in interest Michael Ware alleges that he was injured in a multi-vehicle collision. The defendants designated a responsible third party. The trial court later struck the designation on Ware's motion. Defendant-relator Leonel Molina filed a petition for writ of mandamus asserting in one issue that the trial court abused its discretion by striking the designation.

*79Because Molina adduced some evidence that the designated responsible third party is, at least in part, potentially…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. In Re Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaTexas Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Western Investments, Inc. v. UrenaTexas Supreme Court · 2005
  3. In Re Labatt Food Service, L.P.Texas Supreme Court · 2009
  4. Union Pump Co. v. AllbrittonTexas Supreme Court · 1995
  5. Ford Motor Co. v. LedesmaTexas Supreme Court · 2007

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Barnes v. Road Carriers, Inc.District Court, E.D. Texas · 2025
  2. Giwa v. State Farm LloydsDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 2025
  3. In Re: East Texas Medical Center Athens v. the State of Texas, Texas Court of Appeals, 12th District (Tyler)2023
  4. Jeanette Engler and Richard Lichdean v. the Ritz-Carlton Hotel Company, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2023
  5. Oncor Electric Delivery Company LLC v. Victor Quintanilla, Oscar Interiano Rosales and Accident Fund Insurance Company of America, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2022

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API