Legal Opinion

Kastner v. Duffy-Mott Co.

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided October 16, 1925PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Per curiam

Judgment unanimously reversed upon the law, with thirty dollars costs to appellant, and complaint dismissed, with appropriate costs in the court below.

The defendant was a manufacturer of cider. Upon selling it to plaintiffs, defendant included in the purchase price a ten per cent tax which the government claimed under the Revenue Act of 1918 (40 U. S. Stat. at Large, 1116, § 628); and defendant notified plaintiffs of the fact that the purchase price included that tax. Later it *887was held that cider was not taxable (Casey v. Sterling Cider Co., 294 Fed. 426; Monroe Cider, Vinegar & Fruit Co. v.…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Casey v. Sterling Cider Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1923
  2. Moore v. . Des ArtsNew York Court of Appeals · 1848

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Wayne County Produce Co. v. Duffy-Mott Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1927
  2. Heckman & Co. v. I. S. Dawes & Son Co.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1926
  3. Smith v. Sparks Milling CompanyIndiana Supreme Court · 1942
  4. United States v. American Packing & Provision Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1941
  5. Cohen v. Swift & Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1938

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API