Kastner v. Duffy-Mott Co.
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
1Per curiam
Judgment unanimously reversed upon the law, with thirty dollars costs to appellant, and complaint dismissed, with appropriate costs in the court below.
The defendant was a manufacturer of cider. Upon selling it to plaintiffs, defendant included in the purchase price a ten per cent tax which the government claimed under the Revenue Act of 1918 (40 U. S. Stat. at Large, 1116, § 628); and defendant notified plaintiffs of the fact that the purchase price included that tax. Later it *887was held that cider was not taxable (Casey v. Sterling Cider Co., 294 Fed. 426; Monroe Cider, Vinegar & Fruit Co. v.…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Casey v. Sterling Cider Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1923
- Moore v. . Des ArtsNew York Court of Appeals · 1848
3Cited by9 opinions
- Wayne County Produce Co. v. Duffy-Mott Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1927
- Heckman & Co. v. I. S. Dawes & Son Co.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1926
- Smith v. Sparks Milling CompanyIndiana Supreme Court · 1942
- United States v. American Packing & Provision Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1941
- Cohen v. Swift & Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1938
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.