Legal Opinion

A.S. v. State

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided March 25, 2010No. 10A04-0911-JV-630PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BAKER, Chief Judge.

A juvenile facing charges of delinquency and her mother were given a form apprising them of the rights, but not waiving those rights. They signed the form. They never retained an attorney during the delinquency proceedings. The trial court never inquired into their ostensible decision to proceed pro se, nor did it advise them regarding the perils of self-representation. Indeed, there are no discussions in the record whatsoever regarding the right to an attorney, the advantages of retaining one, or their ability to represent themselves. Under these circumstances, we…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. In Re GAULTSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Burgett v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. Poynter v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2001
  4. United States v. Rosivito HoskinsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2001
  5. Williams v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1982

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. A.S. v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2010
  2. As v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2010
  3. K.T. v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2014
  4. L.O.C. v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.)Indiana Court of Appeals · 2017
  5. T D v. State of IndianaIndiana Supreme Court · 2023

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API