Legal Opinion

United States v. Ruben Reinis

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided July 14, 1986No. 85-5140PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HARDY, District Judge:

Ruben Reinis was convicted of aiding and abetting a bank’s failure to report currency transactions as required by 31 U.S.C. § 5313(a) (“the Reporting Act”) in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2, conspiring to violate the Reporting Act in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 371, and causing concealment of a material fact from the Internal Revenue Service in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1001. We reverse.

Reinis ran a money laundering operation. On several different days, he and his agents paid cash to purchase cashier’s checks from various banks. Each of the checks was for less than $10,000. The…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. California Bankers Assn. v. ShultzSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. United States v. VarbelCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
  3. United States v. RichterDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1985
  4. United States v. Two Hundred Thousand Dollars ($200,000) in United States CurrencyDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 1984

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. United States v. Murad NersesianCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1987
  2. United States v. TarantinoCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1988
  3. United States v. Bank of New England, N.A.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1987
  4. United States v. St. Michael's Credit Union and Janice SacharczykCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1989
  5. United States v. Stanley P. GimbelCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1987

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API