Legal Opinion

United States v. Varbel

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided January 10, 1986No. Nos. 84-1231, 84-1248, 84-1250 and 84-1251PublishedCited by 67 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BEEZER, Circuit Judge:

The conversion of cash into funds that may be exchanged easily without a trace of their origin is a recognized problem for law enforcement officials. Money laundering is common among narcotics traffickers, tax evaders and organized crime figures. The substantive crimes alleged in the indict*759ment at issue involve the concept of “money laundering.”

Appellants were convicted of wire fraud, conspiracy to conceal and concealing material facts within the jurisdiction of the Internal Revenue Service. They contend that the indictment failed to allege a crime under 31 U.S.C. §§…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Kolender v. LawsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. United States v. BassSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. Bouie v. City of ColumbiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  4. California Bankers Assn. v. ShultzSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  5. Dickerson v. New Banner Institute, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by67 opinions

  1. United States v. Murad NersesianCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1987
  2. United States v. TarantinoCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1988
  3. Nir Goldeshtein v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
  4. United States v. Bank of New England, N.A.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1987
  5. United States v. St. Michael's Credit Union and Janice SacharczykCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1989

62 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API