State v. Santiago
Supreme Court of Rhode Island
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
2Per curiam
This case came before the Supreme Court on March 9, 2004, pursuant to an order directing the parties to appear and show cause why the issues raised in this appeal should not summarily be decided. After hearing the arguments of counsel and reviewing the memoranda of the parties, we are satisfied that cause has not been shown. Accordingly, we shall decide the appeal at this time.
The facts of this case were set forth previously in State v. Santiago, 799 A.2d 285 (R.I.2002) (per curiam) (Santiago I):
“At approximately 10:30 p.m. on November 29, 2000, Anibal Santiago (Santiago or defendant),…
3Cases cited7 opinions
- Ashe v. SwensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- State v. GodetteSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2000
- State v. GautierSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2001
- State v. HieSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1996
- Garganta v. Mobile Village, Inc.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 1999
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by5 opinions
- State v. GautierSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2005
- State v. WernerSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2005
- Wiggins v. Rhode IslandDistrict Court, D. Rhode Island · 2004
- Peoples Liquor v. Dept. of Bus. Reg.Superior Court of Rhode Island · 2007
- Shabshelowitz v. State of Rhode Island Department of Public SafetyDistrict Court, D. Rhode Island · 2024