Legal Opinion

State v. Hie

Supreme Court of Rhode Island

Decided January 10, 1996No. 96-100-CAPublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

2Per curiam

This case requires us to decide whether the doctrine of collateral estoppel may be used by the state against a criminal defendant to preclude relitigation regarding whether that defendant is a probation violator. Counsel for both parties came before us to show cause why this appeal should not be summarily decided. Having studied their arguments, we perceive no cause and shall therefore proceed to consider the merits of the defendant’s appeal at this time.

The defendant, Sheldon P. Hie, appeals from a Superior Court order revoking his probation on a prior Superior Court sentence. In…

3Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Ashe v. SwensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. United States v. Raymond Luc Levasseur, A/K/A John, Jack, Jake and George, United States v. Raymond Luc Levasseur, Etc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1988
  3. State v. ChaseSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1991
  4. PROVIDENCE TEACHERS U., LOC. 958, AFT v. McGovernSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1974
  5. State v. JacquesSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1989

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by21 opinions

  1. In the Interest of L.J.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
  2. State v. GodetteSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2000
  3. State v. GautierSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2001
  4. Hampton v. StateSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2001
  5. State v. ZnoskoSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2000

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API