Orman, L. v. Mortgage I.T.
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION BY
MUNDY, J.:
Appellant, Leslie-Eve Orman, appeals pro se from, the June 12, 2014 order granting the motion for summary judgment and entering judgment in favor of Appellees, Mortgage I.T. (Mortgagelt), Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems (MERS), and CitiMortgage, Inc. (Citi). After careful review, we vacate and remand with instructions.
The trial court summarized the relevant factual and procedural background of this case as follows.
This case involves a dispute over a residential mortgage. In [sic] actually began in January of 2011, when [Appellant] along with Thomas Orman filed…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- City of Philadelphia v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
- Sprague v. CaseySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
- Mazur v. Trinity Area School DistrictSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2008
- Mechanicsburg Area School District v. KlineSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
- Cry, Inc. v. Mill Service, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by46 opinions
- Northern Forests II, Inc. v. Keta Realty Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
- Commonwealth v. DemoraSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
- Hendricks v. HendricksSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
- Kinney, B. v. Lacey, A.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2021
- Belliveau, C. v. Phillips, R.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2019
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.