Legal Opinion

Tribune Co. v. Spicola

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided January 27, 1989No. 88-1884PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RYDER, Acting Chief Judge.

The Tribune Company (the Tribune) appeals from a final order denying it access to investigative records held by three agencies of the state and Hillsborough County. The question presented for our review involves the sometimes competing notions of grand jury secrecy, the public’s right of access to public records and the right of individuals wrongfully accused of committing crimes to have their records sealed *758from public inspection. In certain cases, the public’s right to view public records may be outweighed by either the need to maintain secrecy in grand jury…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. In Re Grand Jury Investigation.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980
  2. Tribune Co. v. CannellaSupreme Court of Florida · 1984
  3. Alcorn v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. In Re Grand Jury Investigation of Ven-FuelDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 1977
  5. Tribune Co. v. CannellaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1983

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Barfield v. City of Fort Lauderdale Police DepartmentDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1994
  2. Barfield v. FT. LAUDERDALE POLICE DEPT.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1994
  3. City of Miami v. Metropolitan Dade CountyDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 1990
  4. Ago, Florida Attorney General Reports1992
  5. Ago, Florida Attorney General Reports2002

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API