Legal Opinion

Karram v. Cirillo

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 21, 2001PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Order unanimously affirmed with costs. Memorandum: Supreme Court properly denied defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the amended complaint. Defendant failed to meet his initial burden of establishing his entitlement to judgment as a matter of law. The submissions of defendant in support of the motion raise triable issues of fact whether he activated his turn signal and whether he came to an abrupt stop without warning prior to the accident (see, Weber v Chapman, 238 AD2d 946; Silvestro v Wartella, 224 AD2d 799; Thorndike v Coombes, 63 AD2d 843, 845). (Appeal from Order of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Silvestro v. WartellaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
  2. Thorndike v. CoombesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1978
  3. Weber v. ChapmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Bixler v. Buckeye Pipe Line Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
  2. Gawera v. ScroggAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
  3. Haust v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2013
  4. Graczyk v. AllenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API